Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pda
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 26829
1
vote
1
answer
11
views
Are there any risks with the PDA account generate with the hash function?
I currently have a PDA account with the following structure:
#[derive(AnchorSerialize, AnchorDeserialize)]
pub struct NewFoo {
pub foo_id: String,
}
#[derive(Accounts)]
#[instruction(new_foo: NewFoo … Can a hash function be used to generate a seed for a PDA account? If yes, is this a common practice?
I appreciate any insights or guidance you can provide on this. …
- 111