Question: Ownership and Write Permissions for PDA Accounts in Solana Programs
I’ve been exploring how the #[account]
macro in the Anchor framework interacts with the ownership model of PDA accounts, particularly regarding write permissions. Here’s what I understand so far:
Ownership at Initialization:
When a PDA (Program Derived Address) accountA
is initialized by a programp1
, theowner
field of the account is set top1
's program ID. This ownership ensures thatp1
can use theBox<Account<'info, T>>
wrapper for deserialization because it enforces the following ownership check:Account.info.owner == T::owner()
Here,
Account.info.owner
is the runtime owner of the account, andT::owner()
is the program ID derived from the#[account]
macro, which is statically associated withp1
.Behavior of the
#[account]
Macro:
The#[account]
macro implements theOwner
trait for the associated structT
using the program ID declared viadeclare_id!
. This means the program ID of the struct’s defining program is embedded in the type, enabling theAccount
wrapper to verify ownership.From the documentation:
"The
#[account]
attribute implements theOwner
trait for a struct using thecrate::ID
declared bydeclare_id!
in the same program."Initialization and Discriminator Matching:
During initialization, the PDA’s data includes a discriminator (the first 8 bytes) to identify the account type. This ensures that onlyp1
, the initializing program, can create valid accounts of this type. Any program attempting to deserialize the account must satisfy the discriminator and ownership check.The combined condition is:
Account.info.owner == T::owner()
Key Question: Can Other Programs Write to PDA Accounts? Why ??
If the ownership (owner
) of the PDA is set top1
, does this guarantee that onlyp1
can write to the account? Are there specific cases where another program could bypass this restriction, such as via cross-program invocation (CPI) with writable access or other mechanisms?
Follow-up Points:
- Is the combination of ownership (
owner
) and discriminator checks sufficient to ensure data integrity for the PDA account? - How does this model compare to standard system accounts where ownership isn't explicitly checked for write permissions?
Any clarification or additional insights into these mechanisms would be highly appreciated!